Not open all the way down, that maybe there’s just a small opening with a fewīuttons, like a polo shirt. Most (if not all) of the times we see Harry changing into his school robes he’sĭescribed as pulling them over his head. The movie robes would be put on and off like a bathrobe or a coat. (PS-CoS) little clasps, which would take next to no time to do up and undo, so Robes are completely open at the front save for one (PoA-onwards) or two Much more sense to have the Hogwarts uniform resemble traditional wizarding School uniforms tend to be on the conservative side of fashion, it would make Wizards struggling with muggle clothing, doesn’t really add up. Uniform with robes instead of a blazer, which, considering how often we see However, what I see as aīigger issue is the fact that the movie!uniform is basically a muggle school House indicator (see the Penelope Clearwater and Crabbe-and-Goyle’d
That the basic (I’ll talk more about this later) uniform does not bear any Most people point outĪs proof of this that in a couple of occasions we are told more or less directly That’s how I see them in my head, I consider canonical. I like the movie uniforms, the way I see it, they’re irreconcilable with thoseĭescribed in the books, which, both because they’re from the book and because HBP), I thought I had to write a post about it.
Since wizarding fashion is one of myįavourite subjects (particularly since the word “corsets” was mentioned in Day I read a series of posts on the Hogwarts uniform and how book!uniformĭiffers from movie!uniform, which is more canonical and whether there’sīeen/there should be some retconning to unify the books, films and
0 kommentar(er)
